New Inpatient Visitor Check-In Process Effective March 10. Learn more here.
Breadcrumb
- Home
- Research & Training
- Translational Medicine
- Translational Research Disease Groups
- Colorectal & SI Cancer
- Colorectal and SI Cancer TRDG: Meetings and Minutes
Colorectal and SI Cancer TRDG: Meetings and Minutes
Agenda:
- The current status of translational research efforts at FCCC and Temple in the particular disease site including the status of Investigator-initiated trials and opportunities based on science and feasibility.
- Opportunities for collaboration based on existing ongoing activities or through knowledge of developments in the field.
- To exchange information regarding funding opportunities.
- To consider multidisciplinary programmatic efforts that may be supported by P01s or SPOREs.
- To discuss progress that is being made through more focused presentations by specific investigators or subgroups.
- To take full advantage of institutional capabilities and resources in terms of genomics, tissues, CTO, and to integrate across programmatic efforts, basic or clinical research activities and tumor boards.
- To bring in additional investigators including lab members/trainees involved in translational research.
The TRDGs strive to recognize and develop opportunities for collaborative translational research directions by providing a focused forum for exchange of information among a diverse group of stake-holders interested in a particular disease site. Before each meeting, depending on the particular expertise, participants are asked to review/be prepared to discuss the current disease site early phase investigational protocols at FCCC, the potential opportunities in industry with available targeted agents, potential collaborations with other institutions that have activated protocols with novel agents, specific molecular targets or signaling pathways for the disease site at FCCC, resistance mechanisms, potential biomarkers that can be incorporated into protocols, and the major open questions for the disease site or other more general questions in the field that could be addressed for the disease site.
-
11-22-16
CRC-SPORE Investigator meeting. Dr. Chernoff presented an update on “Targeting the Kinome in KRAS Mutant Colorectal Cancer Project.”
-
10-28-16
CRC-SPORE Investigator meeting. Drs. Clapper and Cooper presented an update on “MicroRNA Signature for the Detection of Flat and Polypoid Colitis-Associated Colorectal Neoplasias Project.”
-
9-28-16
CRC-SPORE Investigator meeting. Dr. Waldman and Weinberg presented an update on “Preventing Colorectal Cancer in Familial Adenomaous (FAP) Project.”
-
9-9-16
Dr. James Duncan spoke about “Targeting the kinome in K-ras mutant colorectal cancer”. He described the human kinome, the kinome screen he developed and published in Cell when he was at UNC and discussed questions regarding resistance and creating new therapy options. There was discussion about approaches for acquired versus intrinsic resistance to therapy. Dr. Duncan spoke about dynamic reprogramming that involves a rapid change in other kinases to allow cancer cell survival and that he is evaluating this in the context of various drivers. Dr. Duncan went onto details of specific therapies where reprogramming is involved. He described in detail his assay for proteomic profiling of tumors. He spoke about KRAS in CRC and mentioned work by Kevin Shokat at UCSF with KRAS G12C and a specific therapy targeting that mutant. Dr. Duncan described efforts to profile the kinome in cells with different mutants and their potential impact on kinome reprogramming.
-
4-26-16Obesity is linked to various cancers and contributes to mortality. Dietary fat reduction improved long-term breast cancer outcomes; study in 1990’s. Insulin and IGF1 drive cell growth. Metabolic syndrome has been associated with increased incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer although some inconsistency in the literature re degree of effect. There is no information on association with those at genetic risk. Dr. Esnaola spoke about SEER data from Medicare where he looked at a cohort of >36,000 patients with CRC stages I-IV, age at diagnosis of 66 and above, gathered various socio-demographic data and looked at various codes for metabolic syndrome or its components. He looked at OS, PFS as a function of primary variable of metabolic syndrome (MetS) versus its components. He used billing data and made the point that obesity is usually undercoded. He saw decreased MetS as a function of older age. Hispanic>black>white prevalence of MetS. He saw rising prevalence of MetS beginning at 1999. OS seemed better with MetS, although not much of an effect. No effect by stage.
DFS also did not see much difference. The results were recently published (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23280333). He looked at hyperinsulinemia; C-peptide and IGFBP. High insulin and reduced IGFBP associated with higher mortality.
Diabetes was associated with worse outcomes (both OS and DFS) for stages I-III but not a big difference in stage IV. Dyslipidemia appeared to be associated with better outcomes (OS and DFS) in CRC by stage although not a big effect by stage IV. Dr. Esnaola discussed some directions going forward based on the results and their implications for screening different populations at risk. Collapse
-
3-4-16
Dr. Niklas Finnberg spoke about establishing normal and cancer organoids. The success rate is low (10-15%) for establishing 2D culture of human tumors. The success rate is higher for 3D culture (71% from biopsies ~90% from resected tissue). The PDX success rate is 23-75% but takes 6-8 months to establish. The take rate in PDX is higher for metastatic lesions than primary tumors. Organoids have been generated from multiple tissues. Dr. Finnberg reviewed organoid culture results from Clevers in Nature in 2008. R-spondin binds lgr4, 5 and activates wnt signaling. He showed growth of intestinal organoids and potential for genetic manipulation with p53F/F appeared to have growth advantage in the context of an organoid. Colonic crypts are much more difficult in plating (1-3%) versus small intestinal organoids (90%). ALK, p38 inhibitors and wnt3a supplementation has been reported by Clevers in Gastroenterology 2011. Current media for organoid culture is complicated with >15 components including valproic acid, PGE2, Rho kinase inhib, Noggin, EGF, Gastrin, Pen/strep, DMEM, Glutamax, wnt3A conditioned media, R-spondin, A83-01, SB202, CHR99021, B27, NAC, HEPES. Dr. Finnberg described a colon cancer from a patient with juvenile polyposis where normal organoids and tumor tissue was cultured. Tumor tissue culture leaves out wnt3a. The Clevers Cell paper from 2015 described prospective derivation of a living organoid biobank of colorectal cancer patients. This paper showed histology of the tumor organoids. They tested 81 drugs. Correlated KRAS with poor cetuximab sensitivity. There are sensitivities without genetic biomarkers. This paper didn’t correlate clinical outcomes with organoid sensivities. There was discussion on Znf43 that can be mutated and is also seen in pancreatic cancer. The Tuveson lab has made correlation between organoid sensitivity with sensitivity to drugs in patients. There was discussion of results from FCCC where normal and tumor organoids were established and general discussion of feasibility and plans going forward.
-
12-11-15
Dr. Joshua Meyer spoke about genomic analysis and the impact of age on CRC development. He described his previous work (Meyer, Cancer, 2010) where he observed increasing rates of rectal cancer in young people (under age 40) but didn’t see that for colon cancer. The rates of rectal cancer have been increasing since 1985. More recently (Meyer, JNCI, 2015) looked at lymph node status by age. The younger patients with rectal cancer were more likely to have positive lymph nodes. There is a correlation with worse survival with more positive lymph nodes in all age groups. Similar trends were observed with more lymph nodes in younger patients with colon cancer. Dr. Meyers referred to TCGA, Nature, 2012 looking at hypermutated tumors versus non-hypermutated tumors. TGF-beta and BRAF enriched in hypermutated tumors while IGF2, miR-483 were upregulated in non-hypermutated cancers. Dr. Meyers described ongoing collaborative analysis in colon versus rectal cancers and differences between younger versus older patients. He also mentioned CGI-066 assessing intra-tumoral heterogeneity and chemo-RT response in locally advanced rectal cancer utilizing DNA sequencing and PET/CT. 17 accrued, 13 analyzed and he presented preliminary findings. Plans include collecting 40 patients looking for response to chemo-RT.
-
9-25-15
There was discussion of an NCCN grant submission opportunity and discussion about EPCRS. Dr. El-Deiry provided an update on the CRC-SPORE with action items including contact with the NCI and working with the grants office to have a clear timeline for the document. Dr. Finnberg introduced his interest in checkpoint kinases and interest in targeting checkpoint kinases to impact on the toxicity of chemotherapy.
-
6-18-15
Dr. Alfonso Bellacosa spoke about DNA repair and translational directions. DNA repair prevents accumulation of mutations in cancer. DNA repair affects methylation as well. He spoke about gene discovery via exome sequencing of high-risk families and presented some data on families in Italy with colon cancer and other rare tumors. MED1 and TDG are involved in mutation avoidance for mutations that arise from deamination of methylated-C. MBD4/MED1 are frequently mutated in MSI tumors. He spoke about contribution to genomic instability MDB4 plus MMR defect leads to a significant rise in C-to-T transitions. TDG is involved in demethylation in addition to mutation avoidance. TET1 is also involved in demethylation. Dr. Bellacosa hypothesized that defects in TET1 or TDG could lead to hypermethylation. Alterations in TET1 are very frequent in CRC. He described biomarkers that are seen with TDG defects. He presented additional results in mouse models. There was some discussion of potential translational directions using biomarkers as well as strategies targeting vulnerabilities in cancer.
-
5-12-15
CRC-SPORE External Advisory Board Meeting. Dr. El-Deiry presented the Program Schematic and Administrative Structure, Advisory Boards, Funding Base, and an overall Program Overview. There was discussion of candidate projects and Cores including Project 1 Targeting c-MET in BRCA-mutant colorectal cancer: El-Deiry, Olszanski & colleagues, Project 2 Clinical implications of microbiome heterogeneity in colon cancer: Issa, Sigurdson, & colleagues, Project 3 Targeting the kinome in KRAS mutant colon cancer: Chernoff, Cohen, Duncan & colleagues, Project 4 MicroRNA signature for the detection of flat and polypoid colitis-associated colorectal neoplasias: Clapper, Cooper & colleagues, and Project 5 Paracrine hormone hypothesis of colorectal cancer: Waldman, Weinberg & colleagues as well as Project 6 Dependence receptors and colorectal cancer: Grady & colleagues. Dr. El-deiry presented Core A Administration, and Core B Biostatistics and Bioinformatics was presented by Ross & colleagues, and Core C Pathology was presented by Connolly, and Cooper. Several candidate Career Enhancement and Developmental Projects were presented including Career Enhancement Project 1 Immunotherapy of CRC via next generation BiTEs: Robinson, Developmental Project 1 Alteration of DNA demethylation in CRC: Epigenetic biomarkers and implications for therapy: Bellacosa, Developmental Project 2 Role of Rpl22 loss in promoting colorectal cancer development and treatment resistance: Wiest, Career Enhancement Project 2 Tumor microenvironment, tumor elicited inflammation and colon cancer: Grivennikov.
-
2-6-15He mentioned that you accumulate more genetic events based on exposures that can impact epigenetic load; sees methylation differences in lipid, CHO metabolism and insulin signaling. Now trying to validate in independent populations. He has an R21 with Dr. Margie Clapper looking for epigenetic signatures in mouse colitis. Also has a submission with Dr. David Weinberg and Nestor Esnaola. He mentioned he would like to work backwards in time to see who is predisposed to colon cancer and to try to differentiate them. In terms of translation, his work would be applicable to people coming in for colonoscopies, in terms of what fraction are on the path to developing colon cancer. Dr. Margie Clapper discussed two potential opportunities for projects. One project involves work on lesions that are flat that harbor p53 mutation and those that are polypoid and harbor beta-catenin mutation in colitis; morphological subtypes arise via different mechanisms and respond differently to therapy. She mentioned that loss of p53 versus mutation of beta-catenin drives the morphological subtypes. In colitis p53 is an early event in ulcerative colitis. She is planning to study an intervention with a p53 conformation modifying small molecule to prevent progression. Dr. Clapper is also working with groups to develop imaging probes for early detection and this work involves human tissue analysis. She mentioned MMP-based probes for early detection in the min mouse model. Initial work with probes that are too broad-based led to the direction of an MMP7-specific probe. Dr. Jean-Pierre Issa mentioned that he is working very actively in 2-3 areas relevant to this discussion. One area involves the interaction between the microbiome and the methylator phenotype in colon cancer. This is exciting work and Dr. Issa is collaborating with a group in Florida. He mentioned the observations are reproducible in mouse models and that changes are detectable in normal mucosa. He further mentioned that CIMP(+) and (-) colon tumors have different microbiomes. Another area of investigation Dr. Issa is pursuing uses CRC lines for drug screening versus epigenetics; epigenetic targeting with drugs. He mentioned that at JHU combination of Aza-C plus irinotecan is being looked at in the clinic in colon cancer. Dr. Issa is also interested in figuring out relationships between aging, methylation and cancer. He mentioned that preventing methylation prevents cancer in the min mouse model and that caloric restriction will prevent methylation. He is studying the induction of inflammation and has foundation grant for this. He is working on Tet proteins and interactions with DNA methylation. Dr. Sergei Grivennikov in studying inflammatory cytokines and has genetic mouse models with cytokine KO. He is interested in the role of the microbiome in inflammation and in CRC. A therapeutic approach he is developing involves the impact of modulation of inflammation plus 5-FU. He is interested in immune cells, cytokines and the TME. IL17 is induced by microbes and is associated with poor prognosis. He is looking at the role of IL23 and IL1 in IL17 induction and looking at tumor growth, invasion and metastasis. He is also interested in the recruitment of myeloid cells and neutrophils, angiogenesis and invasion. Dr. Jon Chernoff presented a direction he is interested in pursuing in collaboration with Dr. James Duncan. They are interested in the mechanism of resistance in KRAS colon cancer looking at the basal kinome in 3-D organoid and PDX models. They plan to treat PDX’s with inhibitors and ask about reprogramming response. At this point the translation to a human end-point would involve tissues. He will reach out to clinicians in order to develop more therapeutic/interventional applications. Dr. Alfonso Bellacosa is working on genome and epigenome stability. He is focusing on TDG that demethylates the DNA and asking whether TDG explain the methylator phenotype in CRC. He is collaborating with Dr. Issa in studying the Tet/TDG axis in CRC. He mentioned that Tet genes are mutated at a low frequency in CRC and that CRCs have elevated levels of a metabolite. He is modeling this in mice and through collaboration with Dr. Clapper is crossing min mice with tet or TDG mutant mice. With Tet1 inactivation, min adenomas are bigger and with Tet1/TDG KO bigger adenomas and hemorrhagic features. He is looking at DNA methylation profiles. This is R01-funded work that is coming up for renewal and he wants to ID critical methylated genes. Dr. Bellacosa is pursuing another angle that applies to various cancers including CRC. He found that TDG is low in CRC and other cancers but certain levels of expression are needed as acute downregulation of TDG leads to arrest, senescence and reduced xenograft formation. He has screened for TDG inhibitors and ID’d two candidates for repurposing. Dr. El-Deiry discussed several directions that may be developed into SPORE projects. These include a direction to bring Quinacrine plus capecitabine (oral 5-FU) in combination therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Quinacrine has single agent anti-tumor efficacy and appears to affect multiple target pathways including NF-kB, STAT3, Mcl-1, works in mutant p53 and mutant KRAS or BRAF expressing tumors, and has an anti-angiogenic effect. Thus this is a translational project with correlative science including use of CTCs for PD biomarker analysis. A second project Dr. El-Deiry is developing in the context of a SPORE involves targeting a subgroup of MSI-high CRCs with BRCA2 mutation and c-MET overexpression. This is a relatively new direction that arose from collaboration with Caris Life Sciences and potentially important as the MSI-high tumors can present as aggressive metastatic tumors that can be resistant to therapy including 5-FU. Given the prevalence of these molecular changes Dr. El-Deiry estimates ~4000 patients each year in the US may fall in this subgroup with advanced stage. The project has several directions including the testing of the sensitivity of MSI-high colorectal cancer cell lines to PARP inhibitors, c-MET inhibitors, or mitomycin as single agents or in combination. He is currently pursuing a validation set and preliminarily has found the prevalence of BRCA2 mutations seems to be present. He would like to investigate a mouse model with deletion of BRCA2 in an MMR-deficient background and would like to unravel the connections as far as signaling between BRCA2 deficiency and c-MET. He would like to determine the impact of the BRCA2 mutation/c-MET overexpression on prognosis versus MSI-high without BRCA2 mutation/c-MET overexpression. Finally he is working to develop a clinical protocol using a c-MET inhibitor plus a PARP inhibitor -/+ mitomycin for patients with MSI-high CRC. Dr. El-Deiry mentioned a 3rd direction that is focused on 5-FU toxicity and variations in 5-FU metabolism in patients. This has a preclinical component looking at p53 regulation of 5-FU metabolizing genes including DPYD that has been recently linked to the EMT. In the clinic Dr. El-Deiry is interested in developing predictive assays for 5-FU toxicity using lymphocytes or circulating serum RNA that can be correlated with 5-FU PK monitoring. Dr. El-Deiry said he will reach out to others who expressed interest in a potential SPORE effort including some who could not make this meeting. These include Drs. David Weinberg, David Wiest, Glenn Rall. He mentioned he will work on further organizing including reaching out to potential core directors, clinical collaborators, and the NCI to begin to assess the level of interest from their perspective. Collapse
-
12-18-14He spoke about bacteria that attach to the tumor and he is trying to sequence loosely attached versus firmly attached bacteria. Dr. Margie Clapper spoke about sugar substitutes and microbiota. She leads the Cancer Prevention and Control Program at FCCC. Her work is focused on prevention primarily in the risk arena using in vivo models, cell culture, and human specimens. She is working with several models including the APC and min mouse models. She studies sporadic CRC and inflammatory bowel disease, more the latter with interest in early detection and early intervention. Morphological subtypes of flats and polypoid lesions don’t arise in the same way. The min model at FCCC develops colon tumors (other min models develop adenomas) and this hasn’t been looked at for microbiota effects. Dr. Clapper has collaborated with Dr. Harry Cooper for 17 years on inflammatory colon cancer models. She mentioned there is data to be mined on gene expression profiling. Dr. Clapper serves as a contractor with the NCI and has access to new agents that come through NCI, and can investigate Tasks that are funded through the contracts. She has an interest in molecular in vivo imaging that is now focused on early detection. To explore this she has been using MMP protease activity and bioactivatable probes with interest in clinical development with Visen that was in the works. She mentioned FCCC was poised to do this research in the clinic and involves endoscopy and MRI. She hopes to do this imaging research in parallel with endoscopy to be able to find smaller lesions. Dr. Clapper also has a reporter mouse of beta-catenin signaling and can use it to intervene with preventive agents. She has a grant to look at folate and the contribution to folate induced colon cancer. Looking for driver of multiple colon tumors. Dr. Elin Sigurdson said investigators can get tissue from the OR and she can foresee injection pre-operatively and then imaging resected specimens. There was discussion that there should be follow-up on the status of the IND. There was some discussion that folate levels are different in different countries. There was also mention that currently at FCCC there is no tracking of ischemic time on banked tissue. Dr. Harry Cooper mentioned he has collaborated from pathology with Dr. Clapper and stated that we don’t get a lot for resected CRCs—probably 100 specimens per year that get banked along with normal mucosa, both snap frozen and formalin fixed. Dr. Michael Hall mentioned that folate is protective in large epidemiologic studies while Dr. Clapper is finding it may be harmful. The risk assessment group at FCCC is interested in hereditary GI-related cancers and is doing population science based research. Blood is collected from 80% of high risk probands but Dr. Hall mentioned we don’t have too many tumor specimens, mostly 7 tubes of blood, half to biosample repository. He has worked with Dr. Enders looking at mitotic checkpoint proteins and their dysregulation. Some of that work is continuing with Dr. Erica Golemis. Dr. Hall is collaborating with Foundation Medicine and is doing tumor-based testing on Variants of Unknown Significance. How much is in germline, how to manage that situation. Epidemiologic and psychosocial aspects; survey work; patient’s understanding of disease. Participates in mutation-specific penetrance study; info accumulated over the last 10 years. Web-based formats for providing genetic info back to patients. Dr. El-Deiry mentioned collaborative studies over the last couple of years involving sequencing of oncogenes, TSGs, and other drug resistance genes in metastatic sites from colorectal cancer. This work was presented at the 2014 ASCO meeting and in general is hypothesis generating and can lead to clinical protocol development. He gave several examples including the use of Her2 targeted therapy for CRC with lung metastasis if tumors overexpress Her2 (and the data shows there is an enrichment of Her2 expression in lung metastases from CRC although the numbers are low ~4%). Another example involves CRC with peritoneal metastases where expression of Topo1 and ERCC1 in the peritoneal metastases would predict sensitivity to irinotecan and resistance to oxaliplatin. This kind of profiling data suggests the possibility of enrolling patients with these profiles to combination chemotherapy with FOLFIRI (vs FOLFOX that they may not do as well with). The selection of subgroups with peritoneal metastases for therapy has not been done before and may lead to being able to show that for some patients FOLFIRI is the regimen of choice. Dr. Jon Chernoff mentioned a project with Dr. James Duncan on KRAS signaling. Dr. Chernoff and Duncan are looking at KRAS in colon cancer effects on the kinome as the disease develops and what happens to the kinome when patients get a MEK inhibitor. There is a clinical trial aspect. They want to use the technology on clinical samples not to guide therapy but to test specimens. They don’t need inhibitor-treated patients at the present time and are looking to characterize the basal kinome. To do this they need a couple of mg of protein and the tumor sample would have to be frozen in the OR at -80 degrees. Dr. Chernoff is looking for a clinical collaborator and has been collaborating with Champions Oncology including PDX mouse models treated with MEK inhibitors. He is planning to generate PDX mice with KRAS driven colorectal tumors. Dr. El-Deiry mentioned laboratory efforts focused on developing therapeutics targeting mutant p53, TRAIL Receptors, hypoxia, and stem cells He mentioned an interest in personalized therapeutics, profiling metastases. He mentioned recent efforts to examine immune checkpoint proteins in sub-types of colorectal cancer and that it may be of interest for Dr. Chernoff to look at the kinome in primary and metastatic tumors. Dr. Elin Sigurdson has a background in metastasis research. She chairs the NCI GI Steering Committee for Rectal cancer. The cooperative groups report to the rectal task force pulling information from SWOG, and others and plan trials and if CTEP has money they get funded. For Rectal cancer this has led to the PROSPECT trial. She mentioned one of the issues is to better plan local excision and colostomy avoidance. She mentioned serving on a colon panel as well for metastatic disease. There are very few trials with correlative science and a big push nationally to do sequencing and then have a target for which there is an agent to get randomized to standard therapy versus targeted therapy while getting standard therapy initially. The first buckets are KRAS and BRAF. Dr. Joshua Meyer spoke about a trial looking at patients who are candidates for pre-operative chemo-RT and taking tissue and doing Foundation Medicine to sequence and correlate with response. He mentioned the plan to enroll 40 patients and look at ~300 genes that Foundation does. Currently discussing whether they can provide access to germ-line information that is obtained from the normal part of the samples. Dr. El-Deiry mentioned the an interest in creating PDX models from circulating tumor cells and performing genomic analysis, heterogeneity analysis as well as drug sensitivity testing in subgroups of colorectal cancer. He mentioned earlier work while at Penn State looking at heterogeneity of CTC numbers in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and work in collaboration with surgical colleagues that relates to CTC numbers around a tumors inflow versus outflow. Such directions have potential to ultimately impact on surgical technique and further analysis of this type may also unravel heterogeneity in the biology of the tumors in vivo as far as which ones produce many cells or a few which would have potential implications for chemotherapy use as well. It may be possible in the future to sample CTCs near a tumor’s outflow by interventional radiology and this may have impact on the plan of care. Collapse
Share
-
Share with Facebook
-
Share with twitter
-
Share with email
-
Print this