Agenda:
- The current status of translational research efforts at FCCC and Temple in the particular disease site including the status of Investigator-initiated trials and opportunities based on science and feasibility.
- Opportunities for collaboration based on existing ongoing activities or through knowledge of developments in the field.
- To exchange information regarding funding opportunities.
- To consider multidisciplinary programmatic efforts that may be supported by P01s or SPOREs.
- To discuss progress that is being made through more focused presentations by specific investigators or subgroups.
- To take full advantage of institutional capabilities and resources in terms of genomics, tissues, CTO, and to integrate across programmatic efforts, basic or clinical research activities and tumor boards.
- To bring in additional investigators including lab members/trainees involved in translational research.
The TRDGs strive to recognize and develop opportunities for collaborative translational research directions by providing a focused forum for exchange of information among a diverse group of stake-holders interested in a particular disease site. Before each meeting, depending on the particular expertise, participants are asked to review/be prepared to discuss the current disease site early phase investigational protocols at FCCC, the potential opportunities in industry with available targeted agents, potential collaborations with other institutions that have activated protocols with novel agents, specific molecular targets or signaling pathways for the disease site at FCCC, resistance mechanisms, potential biomarkers that can be incorporated into protocols, and the major open questions for the disease site or other more general questions in the field that could be addressed for the disease site.
-
9-13-16
-
4-29-16
-
2-9-16
-
12-8-15
Dr. Erica Golemis spoke about how studying a drug leads to new biology. EMT correlates with poor outcome in lung cancer. She discussed the breakdown of therapeutics for NSCLC in 2015. In 2012 she started working with Synta looking at ganetespib, a HSP90 inhibitor being evaluated in lung cancer. HSP90 has hundreds of clients, many of which are oncoproteins. She mentioned that in general HSP90 inhibitors had retinal and liver toxicity while Ganetespib avoids both of these toxicities. A clinical trial in a broad population failed to show an OS benefit. Dr. Golemis spoke about a 655 gene siRNA library screen in 5 NSCLC lines with KRAS/p53 mutations or EML4-ALK fusions. She identified AMH and AMHR2 from the siRNA screen as genes whose knockdown sensitized the cells. Results were recently published (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956518/). The GNRH receptor pathway was noticed and linked to AMH and AMHR2. Additional experiments in vivo demonstrated sensitization by knockdown in two xenografts. AMH = anti-Mullerian hormone; plays role in development and reproduction in pathways seemingly unrelated to lung cancer. There were previously no reports of AMH in lung cancer but TGF-beta, BMP, and lung cancer suggested why identification of AMH is potentially important. She showed expression of AMH and AMHR2 in NSCLC cells with good antibodies and siRNAs. p-SMAD1,5,8 levels came down with AMH KD. BMPR2 levels rose demonstrating a compensatory growth suppressive pathway induction. SMAD3 phosphorylation was also seen that she attributes to BMPR2. AMH or AMHR2 KD prompted EMT with appropriate marker changes. This depletion stimulates invasion. She further showed that induction of EMT depletes AMH, AMHR2 and suggested that the mesenchymal state may sensitize to ganetespib. Dr. Golemis mentioned that AMH depletion or mesenchymal state leads to cisplatin resistance. She further stated that TCGA data shows high AMH/AMHR2 correlates with favorable DFS in lung cancer. She discussed her model and therapeutic implications. There was discussion of recent papers looking at EMT, metastasis and drug sensitivity.
-
9-29-15
-
5-26-15
-
5-4-15
-
2-3-15
-
12-11-14